The Stories We Tell Ourselves: How an Unbalanced Narrative Can Distort Your Brand, Business, and Leadership
Introduction: Why the Stories We Tell Ourselves Matter
Every entrepreneur, leader, and creator is constantly shaping their self-perception through internal narratives. The way we view ourselves directly impacts how others perceive us, and by extension, how they engage with our businesses, brands, and products.
But where does that self-perception come from? The way we view ourselves often starts with what I’ll call a Narrator of Origin—the first voices that shaped our perception of ourselves. This might be parents, teachers, early mentors, or cultural expectations. These foundational voices provide the scripts that we either adopt and subconsciously perpetuate or vehemently reject. However, even in rejecting them, we often spend our energy proving them wrong rather than becoming our authentic selves, which is still a form of subconscious control.
By extension, the unexplored self-narrative inevitably bleeds into the businesses and brands we build. Our co-founders, employees, partners, and customers become actors in a story that is being auto-narrated by our internalized beliefs. When left unexamined, these narratives dictate our leadership style, hiring decisions, company culture, and even how we approach innovation and risk.
The Elaboration Likelihood Model suggests that effective storytelling balances logic (central route) and emotion (peripheral route)—but an unbalanced self-narrative isn’t just about over-relying on one or the other. It’s about over-indexing on the parts of ourselves that have the most supporting evidence and therefore feel comfortable.
For example, if we have always been identified—or celebrated—as highly logical and data-driven, we may unwittingly reject the creative and emotive parts of ourselves. Over time, this leads to mirrortocratic environments, where only those who reflect the dominant traits (such as extreme rationality or emotional detachment) are seen as excellent. The inverse is true for those who have always been defined by their emotional intelligence—if their success has been tied to their ability to connect with others, they may neglect the strategic or analytical aspects of leadership.
This unexamined bias can distort how we see ourselves, create cognitive dissonance, and undermine the credibility of our brand and leadership. This article explores how Self-Discrepancy Theory and the Multiple Audience Dilemma contribute to this imbalance and how resilience is strengthened by owning a cohesive, balanced story.
The Science Behind Self-Narratives: What Shapes Our Identity?
Self-Discrepancy Theory: The Internal Battle of Who You Are vs. Who You Want to Be
Developed by E. Tory Higgins, self-discrepancy theory suggests that we have three self-representations:
Actual Self – Who you believe you currently are.
Ideal Self – Who you aspire to be.
Ought Self – Who you think you should be, based on societal or external expectations.
Discrepancies between these selves can lead to emotional discomfort. For instance, a founder who perceives a gap between their actual self (e.g., feeling inexperienced, unsure, or overwhelmed by the expectations placed on them) and their ideal self (e.g., envisioning themselves as a confident, decisive, and successful leader) may experience intense feelings of inadequacy. This internal conflict can result in cognitive dissonance, where one's beliefs and behaviors are misaligned, leading to psychological stress.
This misalignment manifests in various ways:
Overcompensation: A founder who feels inexperienced might rely excessively on complex jargon, metrics, or rigid decision-making to prove their competence, inadvertently alienating their team or audience.
Paralysis by Analysis: The fear of making the "wrong" decision causes hesitation, delaying crucial business moves and stunting growth.
Self-Sabotage: Internalized doubt can lead to downplaying successes or failing to advocate for oneself in negotiations, partnerships, or investor meetings.
Without addressing these discrepancies, a founder may find themselves stuck in a cycle of seeking external validation while remaining disconnected from their authentic leadership style. The wider the gap between the actual and ideal self, the harder it becomes to maintain confidence, resilience, and effective leadership.
The Multiple Audience Dilemma: The Challenge of Shifting Identities
The Multiple Audience Dilemma occurs when individuals must present themselves differently to various audiences with conflicting expectations. For example, an entrepreneur might need to appear highly analytical to investors while showcasing creativity and relatability to customers. Managing these divergent personas can create cognitive dissonance, as maintaining consistency across conflicting self-presentations becomes challenging.
But what if what we have been labeling as "imposter syndrome" is actually the internal conflict between the story we tell ourselves and the audiences that don't seem receptive to that version of us?
When a founder struggles to be taken seriously by investors despite a strong business case, or when a leader with deep expertise finds their knowledge dismissed due to biases, the dissonance isn’t just internal—it’s relational. They are not doubting their own ability, but rather wrestling with the rejection of their authentic self by key stakeholders. This distinction is critical because it shifts the burden from solely being a "mindset problem" (as imposter syndrome often frames it) to a systemic issue of external validation clashing with internal truth.
The cognitive dissonance arising from both self-discrepancies and multiple audience pressures can undermine resilience. Resilience—the capacity to adapt and thrive amid challenges—relies on a coherent self-concept and the ability to manage stress effectively. When individuals face internal conflicts about their identity and external pressures to conform to varying expectations, their resilience may be compromised. This can manifest as:
Burnout – The mental exhaustion of switching personas constantly to cater to different audiences.
Decision Paralysis – The inability to act decisively because different audiences expect conflicting things.
Inauthentic Behavior – The feeling of "performing" rather than leading genuinely, which erodes trust.
The Consequences of an Unbalanced Self-Narrative
When resilience is compromised, leaders often find themselves stuck in a cycle of misalignment—projecting an image they think their audience wants to see rather than presenting a fully integrated, authentic self. The result? A fragmented narrative that diminishes trust, hinders connection, and weakens leadership presence.
For entrepreneurs and founders, this misalignment doesn’t just affect personal identity—it seeps into the way they communicate their vision, their leadership style, and ultimately, how their brand is perceived. When the story you tell yourself and the story others see are at odds, your influence, credibility, and business suffer.
The consequences of this imbalance can manifest in two distinct ways:
Over-reliance on logic and data, where the focus on proof and structure alienates audiences by stripping out the human element.
Over-reliance on emotion and passion, where vision and personal connection overshadow the tangible proof points necessary to build confidence.
Neither extreme is sustainable. The most compelling leaders—and the strongest brands—are those that strike a balance. They leverage both emotional resonance and logical proof, crafting a narrative that is both believable and inspiring.
Let’s explore real-world scenarios where founders struggle with this imbalance, followed by how the StoryEdge Method helps recalibrate their storytelling for maximum clarity, trust, and impact.
A. When You Lean Too Heavily on Logic & Data
Scenario 1: The Founder Who Thinks the Data Speaks for Itself
Alex is pitching to investors, armed with a meticulously detailed deck filled with financial projections, market analysis, and risk assessments. He assumes that the numbers alone will be enough to convince them. However, despite his airtight logic, the investors seem disengaged. They ask vague questions but don’t appear excited about the opportunity. Later, Alex receives feedback that while his business model is strong, the pitch lacked vision and human connection—they couldn’t see the “why” behind his company.
StoryEdge Method Solution: Instead of just presenting data, Alex learns to weave in storytelling elements that make his metrics more compelling. He starts his pitch with a personal anecdote about the problem his company is solving. By framing the financials within a broader, emotionally resonant context, he transforms his pitch into a compelling narrative. Investors are now not just looking at numbers but at the impact and vision behind the numbers.
Scenario 2: The CEO Struggling to Inspire Their Team
Jordan, the CEO of a fast-growing tech startup, prides herself on data-driven decision-making. She ensures every meeting is packed with dashboards, reports, and performance metrics. However, her employees feel uninspired and disengaged. While they understand the numbers, they don’t feel a sense of purpose in their work. Morale starts to dip, and turnover increases.
StoryEdge Method Solution: Jordan realizes that while logic is necessary, it must be balanced with emotional resonance. She begins integrating stories of customers who have benefited from their technology into company meetings. Instead of just focusing on quarterly revenue growth, she starts framing wins in terms of real-world impact. Employees feel more connected to the company’s mission, and engagement levels improve.
B. When You Lean Too Heavily on Emotion & Passion
Scenario 3: The Visionary Founder Who Struggles to Gain Investor Confidence
Samantha is a passionate founder with a big vision for social impact. In meetings with potential investors, she talks about her deep personal connection to the cause and why she believes in her startup’s mission. While her enthusiasm is infectious, investors hesitate—they love her passion, but they don’t see a clear roadmap to financial sustainability. Without concrete proof points, they perceive the venture as too risky.
StoryEdge Method Solution: Samantha learns to anchor her passion with measurable results. She restructures her pitch to lead with impact-driven storytelling but follows up with proof points—traction metrics, case studies, and a clear business model. This balanced approach reassures investors that her startup is not just an emotional cause but a viable, scalable business.
Scenario 4: The Founder Who Over-Identifies with Struggle
Derek built his business from the ground up, overcoming countless challenges. His story is one of grit and perseverance, and he often shares his struggles to inspire others. However, his constant focus on hardship rather than growth makes it difficult for his audience to see his business as successful. His messaging unintentionally positions him as someone still struggling rather than a leader who has built something worth investing in.
StoryEdge Method Solution: The StoryEdge Method helps Derek reframe his narrative from one of ongoing struggle to one of resilience and achievement. Instead of just talking about how hard the journey has been, he starts showcasing key milestones, lessons learned, and the wins along the way. This shift allows his brand to attract confidence rather than just sympathy.
Recognizing these patterns is the first step to reclaiming control over your story. Whether you’ve been leaning too heavily on logic, stripping your message of emotional depth, or relying too much on passion without tangible proof, the key isn’t to abandon one for the other—but to integrate both with intention.
The best leaders and founders aren’t just great storytellers; they are story architects, shaping narratives that are both emotionally resonant and logically sound. In the next section, we’ll explore real-world scenarios where an unbalanced narrative creates obstacles—and how the StoryEdge Method provides a framework for restoring clarity, credibility, and connection.
The Solution: Rebalancing Your Self-Narrative for Authenticity & Success
If your story has been working against you—whether by over-indexing on logic or drowning in emotion—it’s time to realign your narrative. The strongest leaders, founders, and brands don’t just tell stories; they craft narratives that reinforce trust, drive connection, and inspire action. The key is to blend proof with passion in a way that reflects both who you are today and who you’re becoming.
Below are concrete, actionable steps you can take today to rebalance your self-narrative and make sure the story you tell yourself—and others—aligns with your leadership, brand, and vision.
A. Align Internal and External Narratives
Your internal self-perception shapes how others experience you. If there’s a gap between who you think you are and how others perceive you, your brand and leadership will feel inconsistent.
Try this today:
Conduct a self-audit: Write down three words that describe how you see yourself and three words you think others would use to describe you. If there’s a disconnect, that’s your first clue that your internal and external narratives need alignment.
Align messaging across investors, customers, and team members: Review your website, pitch deck, and social media presence—do they reflect both your credibility and your vision?
Resource: Self-Narrative Alignment Workbook
B. Integrate Logic and Emotion in Your Storytelling
People make decisions based on emotion, then justify them with logic. If your messaging leans too far in either direction, you risk either losing credibility or failing to connect. The Elaboration Likelihood Model suggests that the most persuasive stories appeal to both the rational and emotional mind.
Try this today:
Reframe a key message: Take an important story or pitch you share often (your brand origin, why you started your company, etc.). Ask yourself:
Am I relying too much on data? If so, add a personal anecdote or real-world example.
Am I relying too much on emotion? If so, add a key metric or proof point to reinforce credibility.
Use a structured storytelling framework: The StoryEdge Method teaches a balance of data-driven proof points and emotional resonance.
Resource: The StoryEdge Method: Masterclass (Coming soon)
C. Develop an Adaptive Self-Concept
A rigid self-concept locks you into a narrative that no longer serves you. Resilient leaders allow their stories to evolve—they see self-discrepancies not as failures but as evidence of growth.
Try this today:
Reframe past challenges: Write down a major professional challenge you faced. Instead of framing it as a setback, ask: How did this shape my leadership? What did I gain from this experience?
Identify where you’re rigid: Are you overly attached to an outdated version of yourself? If so, what new narrative do you need to step into?
Resource: The Adaptive Leader’s Guide to Narrative Growth
D. Build Resilience Through Narrative Ownership
Resilience isn’t about avoiding setbacks—it’s about owning your full story and integrating lessons from the highs and lows. Your ability to stand firm in your evolving narrative determines how others will perceive and trust you.
Try this today:
Journaling Exercise: Write about a recent win, setback, and lesson learned. What’s the bigger story that ties them together?
Practice narrative consistency: Speak about yourself the same way across all audiences—whether in a pitch meeting, interview, or LinkedIn post.
Seek feedback: Ask a mentor, investor, or peer: Does my narrative feel clear and aligned with my expertise and goals?
Resource: Story Resilience Training
Final Thought: Your Story, Your Power
The way you talk about yourself and your work today shapes how others will see, trust, and support you tomorrow. Whether you’re presenting to investors, leading a team, or building a brand, your self-narrative is the foundation of your influence.
A balanced self-narrative fosters authenticity, credibility, and resilience—allowing you to lead with clarity, inspire confidence, and build meaningful connections. If your story is misaligned—if you’re over-relying on logic or drowning in emotion—it’s not just affecting how others perceive you, but how you see yourself.
Take action today: Revisit your personal story.
Where do you lean too heavily?
Where can you rebalance?
What parts of your narrative need to evolve?
The stories we tell shape the reality we create. Choose one of the exercises above and start rebalancing your self-narrative. And if you’re ready to go deeper, explore the Stories Seen resources designed to help you refine your storytelling for lasting influence.
Next Step: Explore More Tools & Training
